Seven Questions for Trump Haters

Seven Questions for Trump Haters

Joshua Tartakovsky, 1 April 2006   Donald Trump is hated by the liberals and neo-Cons alike. 1.  The American middle class is vanishing. Transnational corporations are moving overseas for cheaper labor. Who supports protecting the economy and who supports “free-trade” which means Mexicans will be producing goods, not Americans? Who supports American workers and miners? Trump supports protectionism. He wants to bring jobs back to America. He wants to tax imports so it will not be worth it for American companies to turn against American workers and move to Asia or Mexico. Hillary does not. She supports transnational corporations and “free-trade” agreements. She works for the corporations not the American people. She is a slave of the military-industrial complex. No wonder that the corporate liberal media, and papers as the Financial Times and the Economiststrongly dislike Trump. Trump is for the American worker, first and foremost. They are for the American corporations, which is not the same. These American corporations moved overseas. Also, when did Hillary utter a word about the dying middle class? Not since 2008 when she was competing against Obama (thanks Navid Nasr for the reference). I forgot that it’s taboo to mention the “M” word.  The same applies for white poverty  including rural poverty, which Bernie Sanders thinks does not exist as if ghettos can’t take on many forms. Bernie Sanders arrogantly denied. Denied. After all, he is from New England so what does he know about rural America?Poor whites must be trash and cannot possibly suffer from poverty.  That the American Dream is dying is another forbidden truth. 2. Are all human lives precious?...
Trump, Demonized Unfairly by the Liberal-Corporate Media, Must Now Appeal to Latinos

Trump, Demonized Unfairly by the Liberal-Corporate Media, Must Now Appeal to Latinos

(Picture from: http://perfectlittlebites.com/2015/04/25/i-was-fired/) By Joshua Tartakovsky, 11 December 2015. There is nothing like a straightforward politician on the right in an already deeply warmongering society such as the United States – ruled by its own military-industrial complex – to cause liberals to shriek in horror when a Conservative politician dares to make a daring suggestion, one that is far less bloody, far less racist and far less destructive than the real actions the US Government is taking all over the world that result in much bloodshed and suffering and with full impunity provided by the failed watchdogs of democracy – the US liberal media. What did Donald Trump actually say? Did he threaten to invade another country? No. That’s what Hilary does. Let us not forget, since we will not be reminded, that it was Hilary, not Trump, who supported the invasion of Iraq and made speeches to this end. Later, she said, “I got it wrong.” But that doesn’t really help the 165,000 civilians who were killed by US forces, allies, police and terrorists since the US invasion, does it? Then, as Secretary of State, Hilary supported the violent killing of the legitimate leader of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi. In Benghazi, Hilary failed to secure the life of the US ambassador despite specific warnings, causing his killing by terrorists, and in fact, allowed for al Qaeda to take over the country. For this she issued no real apology as the extent of her actions remain in the shadows. Why should Hilary apologize if the media did not make an issue of her criminal behavior and did not bring what...